#Noahs_Flood
#WilliamRyan
#WalterPitman
The connection between Noah’s Flood and William Ryan refers to a scientific hypothesis proposed by William Ryan and Walter Pitman, two geologists from Columbia University, in the late 1990s.
Their work is most famously detailed in their 1998 book:
“Noah’s Flood: The New Scientific Discoveries About the Event That Changed History”
The Ryan–Pitman Black Sea Deluge Hypothesis
Core Claim:
A catastrophic flood of the Black Sea around 5600 BCE may be the historical basis for the biblical story of Noah’s Flood.
Key Elements of Their Hypothesis
1. Pre-Flood State:
The Black Sea was a much smaller freshwater lake, cut off from the Mediterranean by a land barrier at the Bosporus.
2. Sea Level Rise:
At the end of the last Ice Age, global sea levels rose rapidly.
Around 5600 BCE, the Mediterranean Sea breached the Bosporus Strait, causing:
Saltwater from the Mediterranean to gush into the Black Sea basin
A dramatic rise in the Black Sea’s level
A catastrophic flood, potentially up to 200 times the flow of Niagara Falls
3. Impact:
• This rapid flooding may have:
Submerged settlements around the Black Sea rim
Triggered mass migrations
Been preserved in regional oral traditions, including Near Eastern flood myths (e.g., Noah, Gilgamesh)
Archaeological and Geological Evidence
• Sediment analysis shows a sudden change from freshwater to saltwater species.
• Shoreline mapping reveals ancient coastlines now submerged.
• However, some archaeologists (like Fredrik Hiebert) have found limited evidence of catastrophic displacement or civilization collapse in the region at that time.
Scholarly Reception
• Support:
• Provides a plausible, localized origin for flood myths
• Aligns with ancient oral traditions being based on real environmental events
• Criticism:
• Some geologists and archaeologists argue the flood may have been more gradual than catastrophic
• Dating and extent of human habitation around the Black Sea before 5600 BCE is still debated
Broader Implications
• The hypothesis is part of a wider scholarly trend linking myths to natural disasters (e.g., tsunamis, volcanic eruptions).
• Suggests that early Holocene climate events had profound cultural impacts that shaped mythologies.
Would you like a comparison of this hypothesis with other flood traditions, or a deeper look into the geological critique of their model?