Lee, Party member dominates the National
이재명 국회의원 ‘탈당 자유’ 우원식반대 당원 ‘권한 2배’ 당원 국회지배 파시즘
이재명 민주당 대표가 공천탈락 현역 의원들에게 ‘탈당 자유’ 권유한 반면, 우원식 선출 반대 당원의 탈당에 ‘권한 2배’로 사죄하며 파시즘 정당체제를 보였다.
이 대표는 19일 대전에서 "당원 동지 여러분, 최근 당에 대해 섭섭하고 아픈 그런 사연도 꽤 있죠. 혼내주기 위해 '탈당해야지' 생각하시는 분 계시면 당비를 끊으세요. 탈당하면 다시 들어오기 너무 힘들어요"라고 ‘자파 지지자 당원 당비 무료 혜택’을 밝혔다.
같은 자리에서 정청래 최고위원은 "어제 지역구로 한 분이 전화했다. '화가 나서 탈당 신청했는데, 저 그냥 당에 계속 있겠다', 당에서는 그것을 준비해서 여러분들 마음이 풀리실 때까지 기다리기로 했다"고 말했고, 앞서 ‘당원이 주인이다’며 ‘당원 주권주의’ 이념으로 밝혔다.이 대표는 앞서 "당원도 2배로 늘리고 당원의 권한도 2배로 늘리고 당원 중심의 정당을 통해서 국민이 주인인 나라 함께 만들어 가자"고 말했다.
이 대표는 18일 호남에서 "2년 뒤 전국 시도당위원장 선거에서 권리당원 투표 비중을 높이자"고 ‘권리당원 정당 체제 구축’을 밝혔다.
이 대표의 ‘당원 주권주의’는 헌법 1조 ‘국민 주권주의’에 대한 파기로 보인다.
김민석 의원(민주당 상황실장)은 12일 "'추미애 의장'이 순리"라며 "당원주권 존중을 순리로 보는 새 정치문법과 다선의 연장자 우선을 순리로 보던 전통 정치문법이 공교롭게 '같은 해법'을 향하고 있다. 두 문법을 합치시켜 당의 단결과 힘을 키워가는 지혜와 결단이 요구된다"고 당원 주권주의로 ‘국회의장 추미애’를 공표하고 16일 투표로 우원식 의원을 선출했다.
이 대표는 공천 파동의 첫 기자회견에서는 공천 심사 불공정 시비로 탈당자가 속출에 대해 헬스장에서 나오면서 "경기하다가 질 것 같으니 경기 안 하겠다“면서 "최근에 탈당하시는 분들이 한두 분 계신 것 같은데, 입당도 자유고 탈당도 자유"라고 28일 밝혔다.
정당법에서 ‘입당’은 <시ㆍ도당 또는 그 창당준비위원회에 입당신청을 하여 입당원서를 접수한 때에는 당원자격 심사기관의 심의를 거쳐 입당허가 여부를 결정하여 당원명부에 등재>라고 규정해 절차 강제조치에 해당된다.
정당법에서 ‘탈당’은 ‘입당’과 같이 ‘시‧도당에 탈당계’ 제출 절차를 통해 ‘정당의 뿌리인 시‧도당 우선 존중’이고 이 대표는 민주당 중앙당의 대표이면서 이를 고의적으로 파기했다.
정당법은 ‘정당’을 <공직선거의 후보자를 추천 또는 지지함으로써 국민의 정치적 의사형성에 참여함을 목적으로 하는 국민의 자발적 조직을 말한다>고 규정해, ‘후보 추천’을 ‘국민의 의사형성 참여’로 제한해 대표자의 임의적인 ‘추천권 행사’를 금지했다.
정당법은 <제29조(정당의 기구) ①정당은 민주적인 내부질서를 유지하기 위하여 당원의 총의를 반영할 수 있는 대의기관 및 집행기관과 소속 국회의원이 있는 경우에는 의원총회를 가져야 한다>고 규정해 ‘후보 추천’에 ‘당원 총의’로 의원총회 권한을 강제했다.
민주당은 헌법 8조에 의거해 국고지원금을 의석수 기반에 막대한 금액을 지원 받아 수천만원 규모의 당원의 당비보다 수천배 이상 엄청난 규모의 국고 지원 의원 단체이다.
민주당은 국고의존 정당체제에서 국민이 선출한 의원을 비하해 당원 주권주의로 '당원 상위 의원 하위'로 운영하므로서 헌법 8조의 ‘조직 활동 민주적’이고 ‘국민 정치의사 형성 참여 보장’에 위배되면 헌법재판소에 해산 심판 청구에 해당된다.
정당법은 ‘민주적 내부질서 유지’를 <29조(정당의 기구) ①정당은 민주적인 내부질서를 유지하기 위하여 당원의 총의를 반영할 수 있는 대의기관 및 집행기관과 소속 국회의원이 있는 경우에는 의원총회를 가져야 한다>고 강제 규정했다.
정청래 최고위원은 "80%가 넘는 당원과 지지자들의 당심과 민심이 여의도에서 반영됐는가 아니었는가가 문제의 핵심"이라며 "당원과 지지자들은 윤석열 정권과 맞짱 뜨는 통쾌감을 추미애를 통해 보고싶었던 것"이라고 "국회의원 중심의 원내정당에서 당원과 지지자 중심의 대중정당으로 틀을 바꿔야 한다"고 ‘정당 민주주의 파기’를 최고위원회에서 20일 밝혔다.
이 대표가 이날 ‘당비 내지 말라’는 지시는 정당법 <31조(당비)>의 ‘정당의 재정자립’과 ‘같은 정당의 타인의 당비를 부담자 당원 자격 정지’ ‘당비납부의무 불이행 당원에 대한 권리행사의 제한 당원자격의 정지 등에 관해 당헌으로 정한다’ 조항을 위배한 것으로 보인다.
양문석 당선인은 “일반시민 50% 권리당원 50%로 뽑힌 국회의원 후보가 총선 통과했다. 그렇다면 원내대표 뽑을 때도 국회의장 후보를 뽑을 때도 똑같이 국회의원 50% 당원 50% 비율 적용하면 되지 않나”라고 ‘당원이 의장 선출’을 21일 말했다.이 대표는 국회 앞의 이 자리에서 “왜 의장 선거에서 민심 혹은 당원의 일반적인 의견과 다른 결론이 났는지, 그리고 이걸 어떻게 개선할 건지 두 가지 질문이 있다”고 우원식 의장 선출에 반대 의견을 밝혔다.
이 대표는 국회의장에 의원 선출에 앞서 당원 동원체제에서 ‘추미애 친위 쿠데타 체제’ 만들기로 선출 시도에서 실패하고 정 의원은 이날 ‘정당 엘리트주의 파괴’로 자파로 구축한 의원 체제에 대해 ‘당원 지배 레짐’ 재시도 실패에 의장 선거에 동원한 친위 당원에 사죄를 보인다.
양문석 당선인은 “일반시민 50% 권리당원 50%로 뽑힌 국회의원 후보가 총선 통과했다. 그렇다면 원내대표 뽑을 때도 국회의장 후보를 뽑을 때도 똑같이 국회의원 50% 당원 50% 비율 적용하면 되지 않나”라고 ‘당원이 의장 선출’을 21일 말했다.이 대표는 국회 앞의 이 자리에서 “왜 의장 선거에서 민심 혹은 당원의 일반적인 의견과 다른 결론이 났는지, 그리고 이걸 어떻게 개선할 건지 두 가지 질문이 있다”고 우원식 의장 선출에 반대 의견을 밝혔다.
<이재명 ‘반복조사’ 정당법 위반 측근 선거운동에 ‘민주질서’ 파기, 2024년 2월 28일자> <이재명 ‘새 후보 추천’ 정당법 ‘국민 의사형성 참여’ 위반, 2024년 3월 3일자> 참조. kimjc00@hanmail.net
Lee Jae-myeong, member of the National Assembly's 'freedom to withdraw from the party' Opposes Woo Won-sik, party member 'doubles authority' Party member dominates the National Assembly, fascism
While Lee Jae-myeong, leader of the Democratic Party, encouraged incumbent lawmakers who were eliminated from the nomination to ‘freely withdraw from the party,’ he apologized for the withdrawal of a party member opposed to the election of Woo Won-sik by ‘doubling his authority’, demonstrating a fascistic party system.
Representative Lee said in Daejeon on the 19th, "Comrades in the party, there have been quite a few sad and painful stories about the party recently. If there is anyone who thinks they should leave the party to scold them, cut off their membership. If you leave the party, it will be very difficult to come back in." ‘Free party dues benefits’ were announced.
At the same meeting, Supreme Council member Jeong Cheong-rae said, "Yesterday, a person called me from my local district. 'I was angry and applied for withdrawal from the party, but I will just stay in the party.' The party decided to prepare for that and wait until you guys calm down." Previously, he stated that ‘party members are the owners’ and that he adhered to the ideology of ‘party member sovereignty’.
Representative Lee previously said, “Let’s double the number of party members, double the authority of party members, and create a country where the people are the owners through a party centered on party members.”
On the 18th, in Honam, Representative Lee announced the establishment of a political party system for Rights Party members, saying, “Let’s increase the proportion of Rights Party members’ votes in the national provincial and provincial party chairperson elections two years from now.”
Rep. Kim Min-seok (Democratic Party Situation Chief) said on the 12th, “Chairman Choo Mi-ae is natural,” and added, “The new political grammar that sees respect for party member sovereignty as natural and the traditional political grammar that sees priority for seniors in multiple elections as natural happen to have the ‘same solution.’ “We need wisdom and determination to unite the two grammars and increase the unity and strength of the party,” he said, declaring “Chairman Choo Mi-ae” based on party member sovereignty, and elected Rep. Woo Won-sik through a vote on the 16th.
At the first press conference of the nomination scandal, Representative Lee came out of the gym to discuss the number of people leaving the party due to the dispute over unfair nomination screening and said, "I won't play because I feel like I will lose." He added, "I think there are one or two people who have left the party recently, and they are free to join the party. “I am free to leave the party,” he said on the 28th.
In the Political Party Act, 'joining a party' is defined as <When an application for membership is submitted to a city/provincial party or its party founding preparation committee and an application for membership is received, the party membership qualification examination body determines whether to join the party or not and registers it in the party member list>, thereby forcing the procedure. It is subject to action.
In the Political Party Act, ‘withdrawal from the party’, like ‘joining the party’, is ‘priority respect for the city/provincial party, which is the root of the political party’, through the process of submitting ‘a withdrawal report to the city/provincial party’, and Representative Lee deliberately broke this even though he is the representative of the Democratic Party’s central party.
The Political Party Act defines 'political party' as <refers to a voluntary organization of the people whose purpose is to participate in the formation of the people's political opinion by recommending or supporting candidates for public elections>, and defines 'candidate recommendation' as 'participation in the formation of the people's opinion'. ', prohibiting the arbitrary exercise of recommendation rights by representatives.
The Political Party Act states, <Article 29 (Organization of Political Parties) ① In order to maintain democratic internal order, a political party must hold a general meeting of its members if it has a representative body and executive body that can reflect the consensus of party members and affiliated National Assembly members.> It stipulated that the authority of the general meeting of members was enforced through ‘party member consensus’ in ‘candidate recommendation’.
The Democratic Party is a group of lawmakers who receive a huge amount of government support based on the number of seats in accordance with Article 8 of the Constitution, receiving a huge amount of government support, thousands of times more than the party expenses of tens of millions of won.
In a political party system dependent on government treasury, the Democratic Party demeans the members elected by the people and operates as a member-sovereign system with 'party members above and below the members'.
If the Democratic Party violates Article 8 of the Constitution’s ‘democratic organizational activities’ and ‘guarantee of participation in forming the people’s political will,’ it will be subject to a request for dissolution to the Constitutional Court.
The Political Party Act defines 'maintenance of democratic internal order' as <Article 29 (Organization of Political Parties) ① In order to maintain democratic internal order, a political party shall have a representative body and executive body that can reflect the consensus of its members, and, if it has members of the National Assembly, a member of the National Assembly. It was stipulated that a general meeting must be held.
Supreme Council member Jeong Cheong-rae said, “The core of the problem is whether the party sentiment and public sentiment of over 80% of party members and supporters were reflected in Yeouido or not,” and added, “Party members and supporters wanted to see the exhilarating feeling of confronting the Yoon Seok-yeol regime through Choo Mi-ae.” “We need to change the framework from a parliamentary party centered on National Assembly members to a mass party centered on party members and supporters,” the Supreme Committee announced on the 20th regarding the “destroyment of party democracy.”
Representative Lee's instruction on this day to 'not pay party dues' was in accordance with the Political Party Act <Article 31 (Party Fees)> of 'financial independence of political parties' and 'suspension of party members who pay the party fees of others in the same political party' and 'rights for party members who fail to pay party dues'. It appears to have violated the clause ‘Restrictions on events, suspension of party membership, etc. shall be determined by the party constitution.’
Representative Lee failed in his attempt to be elected by creating a 'Choo Mi-ae pro-coup coup system' in the party member mobilization system prior to electing the Speaker of the National Assembly, and Rep. Chung criticized the member system established by Jaffa for 'destruction of party elitism' by saying 'party member-dominated regime'. 'Failure appears on retry.
Representative Lee's instruction on this day to 'not pay party dues' was in accordance with the Political Party Act <Article 31 (Party Fees)> of 'financial independence of political parties' and 'suspension of party members who pay the party fees of others in the same political party' and 'rights for party members who fail to pay party dues'. It appears to have violated the clause ‘Restrictions on events, suspension of party membership, etc. shall be determined by the party constitution.’
Representative Lee failed in his attempt to be elected by creating a 'Choo Mi-ae pro-coup coup system' in the party member mobilization system prior to electing the Speaker of the National Assembly, and Rep. Chung criticized the member system established by Jaffa for 'destruction of party elitism' by saying 'party member-dominated regime'. ' He apologizes to the party members for failing to retry.
President-elect Yang Moon-seok said, “The National Assembly candidate elected by 50% of the general public and 50% of the Rights Party members passed the general election. Then, why not apply the same ratio of 50% to the National Assembly members and 50% to the party members when selecting the floor leader and the candidate for the Speaker of the National Assembly,” he said on the 21st, saying, “Party members elect the Speaker.” At this position in front of the National Assembly, Representative Lee asked, “Why is there no election for the Speaker? “I have two questions: whether the conclusion was different from the public opinion or the general opinion of party members, and how to improve this,” he said, opposing the election of Chairman Woo Won-sik.
<Lee Jae-myung’s ‘repeated investigation’ violation of political party law, destruction of ‘democratic order’ by close associates’ election campaign, dated February 28, 2024> <Jae-myung Lee’s ‘recommendation of a new candidate’ violation of political party law, ‘participation in forming public opinion’, dated March 3, 2024>.
Facism, coup d'état, Nomination rejection, government treasury support, national sovereignty, rights party member, party member sovereignty, Woo Won-sik, Lee Jae-myeong, party democracy, political party law, withdrawal from party, Yang Moon-seok