Internet real name system

인터넷 실명제 반대-영어논리및논술 essay

영어논리및논술 Essay 인터넷 실명제 반대

Internet Real-name System

Due to a series of celebrity suicides such as Sully and Goo Ha-ra, there have been growing concerns that the real-name system on the Internet may be necessary. Critics continued to point out that Sully and Gu Hara killed themselves because of malicious comments. Cheong Wa Dae's public petition board has been continuously posting petitions asking for the implementation of the "real name system" on the Internet. Some people say this.

"It's true that a significant percentage of entertainment workers suffer from malicious comments, and it's not uncommon to target certain people and then damage human rights or make daily life impossible by witch-hunting. I think it's necessary to fix this comment system, because not only adults but also students in the same grade are getting this way."

But is it good if the real-name system is implemented? After thinking about the real-name system on the Internet, we came to the conclusion that it isn’t.

First, introducing online real-name system is not expected to be a solution of current problems. Many people think that the crimes happening online is because of the absence of real-name system, but we are punishing this sort of crimes without it. For example, a famous singer in korea sued a person who had written comments which insulted the singer, and the police found and punished the suspect. Internet frauds, which are very common on the internet, can be also solved without real-name system. Because all the people who use web sites must write down their private information like mobile number, detecting suspects and punish thme is not hard in korea. As a result, introducing real-name system could not have any merit but be a waste of time and money.

Secondly, when real name system is implemented, it is more difficult to express our opinion freely than anonymous text. Freedom of anonymous expression promotes freedom of speech in that one can freely express his thoughts and ideas. However, in the case of real name, there are many cases that can't be expressed honestly. For example, if a student evaluates his or her lecture as a real name, he may not be able to express his thoughts and opinions honestly. You may be worried that you will be penalized. In addition, when evaluating the company's policies or products, the real name is revealed, which increases the responsibility for the opinions and is reluctant to comment. It is not possible to argue against the fact that many people can be violated when expressing their thoughts, even if they are not for other reasons. In fact, according to one survey, since the real name system on the Internet, the number of afflictions has dropped by only 1.7%, and the total number of comments has dropped by 68%. This shows that when you write in your real name, you may have difficulty sharing and communicating various opinions. Therefore, it can be said that the real name system of Internet violates the freedom of personal expression rather than the blocking effect of affliction, which results in the decrease of communication.

The real-name Internet system could allow the government to censor the opinions of a small number of individuals or allow conglomerates to steal personal information. The Internet is good because anyone can freely express their opinions at a low cost. However, if the real-name system is carried out, the majority or powerful can reject or suppress minority opinions. The Minerva case, for instance, showed that the government could safely detain a citizen who wrote a letter criticizing the government for hurting the public interest. This means that when the real-name system is in place, a certain political force can politically exploit and persecute an individual if a certain political force decides to do so. One article on the Minerva case said, "If a real-name policy is in place, you can be penalized by certain forces when you say something. If that happens, the people will be scared and won't express their opinions," In fact, in China, government censors the Internet, suppresses many people's opinions and constrains those who post anti-government messages. That is why SNS is not well developed in China, and it is also why many foreign companies are reluctant to invest in China. Also, the real-name system can make it too easy for conglomerates to steal and abuse personal information. Large companies can manipulate individuals in the direction they want through advertising or propaganda. For example, according to a book, Facebook, which uses a real-name system, leads people to do certain things that it wants by connecting certain people in the direction it wants and providing advertisements. In the past, one company had a problem selling personal information to another country.

Introducing online real-name system is not expected to be a solution of current problems, and when real name system is implemented, it is more difficult to express our opinion freely than anonymous text. Furthermore, The real-name Internet system could allow the government to censor the opinions of a small number of individuals or allow conglomerates to steal personal information. Therefore, the real-name system on the Internet should be avoided.