악의 평범성에 관하여
The essay about evil normalty
We need to talk about the evil normality mainly dealt with in our daily life. Engaging in our everyday life passionately by numbering humanity's value in relation to morality. Its own value can be replaced as the personality of an individual as social member. I know that everyone in our life completely signify as an individual in themselves for advancement of the civilization level. That is, the judgement that which one is the truly right one has the possibility to be decisive our life path, regardless of it is toward good or not-so-good as well.
However, I think that most people do not recognize that every single event can affect to their upcoming situation correlatively; just finalize as all Causations and Results no more than the isolated part of them, dose not need to care about thoroughly just a bit. Then how the argument of Evil normality originated from? and why?
At first, In terms of the constructivism, my thinking and ideas are either created from the already-existed opinion or came up with resembled combination as secondary resources. Specifically, people mainly contain the one-stem root derived from 'Right'. Nonetheless, many people illuse the final structure called 'Obligation.'
For instance if it, there is a collective social movement, voicing Populism that revolt from the distinguishing management of aristo-class. They compose the milieu to being subordinated into the worldly social norm for preserving their stabilized program. As a result, there are the social phenomena prevailing inequality gap between classes, moreover, homogenous classes not originated from unequal difference but from ability, it is called meritocracy these days. Subsequently, those who have wanted to stand on the each utmost classes justify themselves by blaming the mass being regarded from someone feeling self-unsatisfying, as loser.
Go beyond, the struggling group have started belittling of those, hoping to spend their time in leisure or hobby, as retarded group could not follow the fast-paced world.
Meanwhile, the people, which want to take part in playing, downplay the struggling-centrism group as timid nerd without dynamic nostalgics. Then, by connecting this conflict correlation, corporations start the damagogue-centric Public Relation via diverse social media (such as SNS, TV, Film, etc). From then on, the ordinary people play their role as consumer, additionally, immerse into the contents filled with a series of fabricated idea as reality. As far as we observe this phenomena in industrialization, the idea finally is capable of being the sort of replica no more than being controlled as tool for the sake of attracting public into the in-media mythology-based milieu. Corporation compose the exceedingly cultural idea by propagating, and mainly instigating by the agenda-set News that the member of in-range, people with hatred mindset did wrong action related to harmful conduct toward society to feel like the world is a series of absurdity to be active. The group, community usually use their overwhelming right without keeping the repeatedly circulated correlation between Right and Obligation. Derived from this right, they start to establish the system called Oligocracy, kind of Neo-aristocracies based on the meritocracy, which has suceeded in the modified version of gerontocracy.
More and more public realize the absurdity of world, Corporation mostly choose the path that leak the uncomfortable veiled truth to public, as well as fabricate by targeting the specific aim to induce public in which they value the image of Justice from event. By doing that, there is another polarization related to Morality. On the one hand, that which the top-tier class justify as that whatever we entail, achieving one's goal is the ultimate problem. On the other hand, it is soon one's quality that depend on the moral-based activity especially public either implicitly or explicitly want.
From this part, which side can be regarded as the completely right? Is there anyone who field into not-so-good quality?
In my opinion, the actual quality of Evil is just the sort of continuously disposed idea depended on the each situations. As far as I told, human society is based on the circulation of relativity of events. People usually decide the one way in front of the multiple-divided path with the at-that-moment applicability rather than absolute answer because of the anxiety, associated with uncertainty. Furthermore, most people judge the events in their everyday life in terms of value decision rather than fact decision. For the detail reason, I'll bring up the relativity. In terms of mimic intrinsic action, people refer and follow the other's conduct, as well as acquire evaluation from another toward certain conduct. Hence, if they either get more negative feedback than positive one or witness that he or she behave the relatively-lowered action, the third person (aside from the watcher) feel superiority about ones in relation to relativity differed from others. Therefore, the ease way to decide is mostly came up with the morality.
